mouse cgrp1 (Cusabio)
Cusabio is a verified supplier 
93
Structured Review
Cusabio
mouse cgrp1
Mouse Cgrp1, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 28 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cgrp1/IL33/pm39412984-240-47-98
Average 93 stars, based on 28 article reviews
Mouse Cgrp1, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 28 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+cgrp1/IL33/pm39412984-240-47-98
Average 93 stars, based on 28 article reviews
mouse cgrp1 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-09
93/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay:Article Title: ILC2-derived CGRP triggers acute inflammation and nociceptive responses in bacterial cystitis. Article Snippet: The library with an average insert size of 300 ± 50 bp underwent 2 3 150bp paired-end sequencing on an Illumina Novaseq 6000 (LC-Bio Technology CO., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) following standard protocols. .. (1) Detection of mouse IL-33 and CGRP in bladders: Bladder supernatants from mice were stored at 80 C until use, and upon thawing on ice, IL-33 levels were determined using the Mouse IL-33 Protein ELISA Kit (Multi Sciences, Cat #EK233), while CGRP levels were quantified using the Mouse CGRP1 (Calcitonin Gene Related Peptide 1) ELISA Kit (Elabscience, Cat #E-EL-M0215). (2) Detection of Human IL-33, CGRP, and creatinine in Urine: IL-33 levels were assessed using the Human Interleukin 33 (IL-33) ELISA Kit (Jianglaibio, Cat #JL19282), CGRP levels were measured with the |
![SCI leads to increased α2δ1 and RAMP1 expression in L3–5 DRG neurons and eWAT, respectively (A) Scatterplot shows α2δ1 expression in Fluoro-Gold retrogradely labeled L3–5 DRG neurons at 7DPO (sham n = 4 and SCI n = 5 biological replicates, 419–486 neurons/experimental condition). Inset: α2δ1 expression in small-diameter (<20 μm) DRG neurons. Mean and SEM (mixed model with a random subject intercept to account for within-subject correlation ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). (B) Distribution of α2δ1 expression in retrogradely labeled CGRP-positive L3–5 DRG neurons at 7DPO. These neurons are a subset of (A) (two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; sham n = 4 and SCI n = 5 biological replicates; 161–233 neurons/experimental condition). (C) Representative fluorescence images of L3–5 DRG at 7DPO. Arrowheads indicate Fluoro-Gold retrogradely labeled CGRP-positive DRG neurons whose centrally projecting axon was severed after SCI. Scale, 50 μm. (D) Distribution of Cav2.1 expression in retrogradely labeled CGRP-positive L3–5 DRG neurons at 7DPO (two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test ∗∗∗ p < 0.001; sham n = 4 and SCI n = 5 biological replicates; 109–236 neurons/experimental condition). (E) CGRP concentration in eWAT at 7DPO. Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, sham n = 4 and SCI n = 4 biological replicates). (F) Representative fluorescence images of eWAT at 7DPO. Scale, 100 μm. (G) Quantification of (F). Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗ p < 0.01, sham n = 4 and SCI n = 3 biological replicates). (H) Representative fluorescence images and 3D reconstruction of nociceptive nerve terminals in the unsectioned eWAT at 7DPO. Scale, 500 μm. (I) Quantification of (H). Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, ns [not significant], sham n = 3 and SCI n = 3 biological replicates). (J) ex vivo eWAT lipolysis under basal (vehicle) and CGRP-stimulated (1 μM) conditions. Scatterplot shows fold change in glycerol release (paired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗ p < 0.01, n = 4 biological replicates). (K) Representative fluorescence and DIC images of cultured adult eWAT adipocytes loaded with the calcium indicator Fluo-4 AM. Scale, 100 μm. (L) Calcium response in primary eWAT adipocyte after vehicle (dH 2 O) and CGRP (43 μM) administration (vehicle n = 81 and CGRP n = 100 eWAT adipocyte traces from 5 independent experiments/experimental condition). (M) Quantification of (L). Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, vehicle n = 81 and CGRP n = 100 eWAT adipocyte traces from 5 independent experiments/experimental condition).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_8638/pmc11148638/pmc11148638__gr3.jpg)
![Cacna2d1 conditional deletion in DRG neurons normalizes eWAT lipolysis after SCI (A) Experimental scheme and timeline of AAV injection to transduce L3–5 DRG. (B) Real-time qPCR shows Cacna2d1 normalized expression in adult L3–5 DRG from Cacna2d1 fl/fl mice injected with either AAV-GFP or AAV-Cre. Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, AAV-Ctr n = 4 and AAV-Cre n = 4 biological replicates). (C) Representative hematoxylin and eosin images of eWAT at 7 days post injury (DPI). Scale, 100 μm. (D) Quantification of adipocyte area in (C). Mean and SEM (two-way ANOVA ∗∗ p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns [not significant], AAV-GFP/SCI n = 3 and AAV-Cre/SCI n = 3 biological replicates; 2,063–2,322 adipocytes/experimental condition). (E) Ex vivo eWAT lipolysis at 7DPI. Mean and SEM (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test ∗∗ p < 0.01, ns [not significant], AAV-GFP n = 6, AAV-GFP/SCI n = 5, and AAV-Cre/SCI n = 6 biological replicates). The AAV-GFP samples are the same as in <xref ref-type=](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_8638/pmc11148638/pmc11148638__gr4.jpg)
Figure S4 E. (F) Immunoblots show pHSL, HSL, and ATGL expression in eWAT at 7DPI. GAPDH is used as a loading control. (G) Quantification of (F). Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗ p < 0.01, AAV-GFP/SCI n = 4 and AAV-Cre/SCI n = 4 biological replicates). (H) CGRP concentration in eWAT at 7DPI. Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗ p < 0.01, AAV-GFP/SCI n = 4 and AAV-Cre/SCI n = 4 biological replicates). (I) Representative hematoxylin and eosin images of eWAT at 7DPI. Scale, 100 μm. (J) Quantification of adipocyte area in (I). Mean and SEM (two-way ANOVA ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns [not significant], Na v 1.8-Cre n = 5 and Na v 1.8-Cre/ Cacna2d1 fl/fl n = 5 biological replicates; 2,732–3,170 adipocytes/experimental condition). (K) Ex vivo eWAT lipolysis at 7DPI. Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, Na v 1.8-Cre n = 4 and Na v 1.8-Cre/ Cacna2d1 fl/fl n = 5 biological replicates). (L) Immunoblots show pHSL, HSL, and ATGL expression in eWAT at 7DPI. GAPDH is used as a loading control. (M) Quantification of (L). Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, Na v 1.8-Cre n = 4 and Na v 1.8-Cre/ Cacna2d1 fl/fl n = 5 biological replicates). (N) CGRP concentration in eWAT at 7DPI. Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗ p < 0.01, Na v 1.8-Cre n = 8 and Na v 1.8-Cre/ Cacna2d1 fl/fl n = 10 biological replicates). " width="100%" height="100%">
![α2δ1 pharmacological blockade via GBP administration normalizes eWAT lipolysis and reduces ectopic lipid accumulation in the liver after SCI (A) Experimental scheme. (B) Mouse body weight. Mean and SEM (mixed model with a random subject intercept to account for within-subject correlation ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns [not significant], sham n = 10, vehicle/SCI n = 11, and GBP/SCI n = 11 biological replicates). (C) Representative images of hematoxylin and eosin-stained eWAT sections 28DPO. Scale, 100 μm. (D) Quantification of adipocyte area in (C). Mean and SEM (two-way ANOVA ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns [not significant], vehicle/SCI n = 5 and GBP/SCI n = 4 biological replicates; 654–1,051 adipocytes/experimental condition). (E) Ex vivo eWAT lipolysis at 30DPI (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, vehicle/SCI n = 6 and GBP/SCI n = 6 biological replicates). (F) Glycerol concentration in the serum at 30DPI. Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, vehicle/SCI n = 5 and GBP/SCI n = 4 biological replicates). (G) Immunoblots show pHSL, HSL, and ATGL expression in eWAT at 30DPI. GAPDH is used as a loading control. (H) Quantification of (G). Mean and SEM (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, ns [not significant], vehicle/SCI n = 3 and GBP/SCI n = 3 biological replicates). (I) CGRP concentration in the serum at 7DPI. Mean and SEM (unpaired 2-tailed Student’s t test ∗ p < 0.05, vehicle/SCI n = 6 and GBP/SCI n = 5 biological replicates). (J) Representative images of liver sections stained with oil red O to visualize lipid accumulation. Scale, 50 μm. (K) Quantification of (J). Mean and SEM (two-way ANOVA ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ns [not significant], vehicle/SCI n = 4 and GBP/SCI n = 5 biological replicates). (L) Metabolic cage assessment (CLAMS) of oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) and respiratory exchange rate (RER) at 1 month after SCI. Mean and SEM (mixed model with a random subject intercept to account for within-subject correlation, p values for group/period interaction are provided, sham n = 4, SCI n = 4, vehicle/SCI (middle) n = 4, GBP/SCI n = 5, vehicle/SCI (right) n = 4, and dGBP/SCI n = 5).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_8638/pmc11148638/pmc11148638__gr5.jpg)
